Performance: Difference between revisions
From Biowerkzeug Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
deathspud results |
deathspud p3 |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| 1:04 | | 1:04 | ||
| hippo | | hippo | ||
| rev32 <!-- deathspud --> | |||
|- | |||
| Intel | |||
| [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Core_2_microprocessors#.22Yorkfield.22_.2845_nm.29 Core 2 Quad Q9550] | |||
| 2.83 | |||
| 4 | |||
| 1:06 | |||
| hippo_p3 | |||
| rev32 <!-- deathspud --> | | rev32 <!-- deathspud --> | ||
|- | |- |
Revision as of 19:52, 14 November 2008
As a basic performance test we run the simulations in the test directory with these commands (on Linux):
cd testjobs time ./calc_testjobs
- We report the user time.
- CPU properties are found with
cat /proc/cpuinfo
and model names from List_of_Intel_microprocessors for Intel (also see the detailed lists of Intel x86 cpus) and List_of_AMD_microprocessors for AMD cpus (also see the detailed lists of AMD cpus). - Also report the binary used (hippo or hippo_p3) and the revision.
- Note that these tests only utilize a single core.
- These results only give a rough idea of the relative performance of different architectures.
Please add your own results.
vendor | model | GHz | cores | time/min | binary | revision |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel | Core 2 Quad Q9550 | 2.83 | 4 | 1:04 | hippo | rev32 |
Intel | Core 2 Quad Q9550 | 2.83 | 4 | 1:06 | hippo_p3 | rev32 |
Intel | Quad Core Xeon L5410 | 2.33 | 4 | 1:27 | hippo | rev32 |
Intel | Quad Core Xeon L5410 | 2.33 | 4 | 1:31 | hippo_p3 | rev32 |
Intel | Core Duo T2300 (Mac Mini) | 1.66 | 2 | 2:41 | hippo_p3 | rev32 |
Intel | Xeon 2.4 | 2.4 | 1 | 3:03 | hippo_p3 | rev26 |
AMD | Athlon XP 1800+ | 1.53 | 1 | 4:30 | hippo_p3 | rev26 |
(You don't have to link to the CPU wikipedia page; just put down whatever you got and even if you're unsure. If in doubt just put the output from
cat /proc/cpuinfo | \ awk 'BEGIN {FS=":"}; \ /vendor_id/ {vendor=$2}; \ /model name/ {model=$2}; \ /cpu MHz/ {GHz=$2/1000}; \ /siblings/ {cores=$2}; \ END {printf("|-\n| %s\n| %s\n| %.1f\n| %d\n| TIME\n| ?\n| ?\n", vendor, model, GHz, cores)}'
into the wiki table and replace TIME by what you measured.